Publication Laka-library:
Nuclear Power for greenhouse gas migitation under Kyoto Protocol: the CDM
Author | Hans Holger Rogner, IAEA |
6-01-2-18-12.pdf | |
Date | September 2000 |
Classification | 6.01.2.18/12 (NP & GREENHOUSE EFFECT - FLEXIBLE MECHANISMS CDM/JI/EMISSION TRADE) |
Front |
From the publication:
Nuclear Power for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation under the Kyoto Protocol: The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Hans-Holger Rogner Department of Nuclear Energy International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Background on the Kyoto Protocol and Flexible Mechanisms The possibility of global climate change resulting from an increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphere is a major global concern. At the Third Conference of the Parties (CoP 3) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) held at Kyoto, in December 1997, industrialized countries (i.e., Annex I countries1) agreed to accept binding commitments that would reduce their collective GHG emissions, in the 2008-1012 commitment period, by at least 5% below 1990 levels 2. These Annex I countries also agreed to make demonstrable progress towards reducing GHG emissions by 2005. Because climate change is a global problem, i.e., it does not matter where on the globe GHGs are emitted – they all end up in the same atmosphere, many market economists maintain that mitigation should first occur wherever it is cheapest. Thus Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol makes provisions by which those signatories who are required to limit emissions can gain credit for financing cost-effective mitigation projects in developing countries, while at the same time promoting sustainable development through the provision of financial and technical assistance. This option is known as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The CDM could be of particular interest to developing countries, which are not subject to emission limitations in the Kyoto Protocol. For example, the use of capital-intensive nuclear power instead of less costly coal-fired electricity generation would result in a significant reduction in GHG emissions. Because many developing countries may not be able to afford the higher investm