de Laka-catalogus

nr titel auteur datum
3.01.0.00/32The untold story: Economic Benefits of Nuclear TechnologiesOrganisations United 1996
3.01.5.23/05Risky relapse into Reprocessing. Environmental and Non-Proliferation Consequences of DOE's Spent Fuel Management ProgramNoah Sachs, IEER 1996
3.27.0.00/12Brazilian energy balance 1996Min. of mines & energy 1996
3.27.0.00/14Histórias secretas do Brasil nuclearTania Malheiros 1996
3.28.0.00/03Estructura EnergéticaP.Bertinat, WISE Rosario 1996
3.01.0.00/30Deadly Radiation Hazards USA databaseVisual Information Project december 1995
3.01.0.20/15US Nuclear Power Plants -Showing their Age. Case Study: Steam Generator Corrosion december 1995
3.01.0.20/16US Nuclear Power Plants -Showing their Age. Case Study: Reactor Pressure Vessel EmbrittlementRobert Pollard, Union of Concerned Scientists december 1995
3.01.0.20/14US Nuclear Power Plants -Showing their Age. Case Study: Core Shroud CrackingRobert Pollard, Union of Concerned Scientists september 1995
3.02.4.10/09Social and Ethical Issues Surrounding the Disposal of Nuclear Fuel Waste -A Canadian PerspectiveAECL, Allan, Greber september 1995
3.02.0.00/17Canadian Uranium and the French Nuclear Weapons ProgramWISE Paris, Mycle Schneider augustus 1995
3.01.5.30/03Alternative Futures for DOE National LaboratoriesEnergy Advisory Board februari 1995
3.01.0.00/26A Summary History; Department of Energy 1977 - 1994US DOE november 1994
3.01.5.30/04Alternative Futures for DOE National Laboratories, Vol IIDepartment Of Energy september 1994
3.01.5.30/08Vol II, Part 1: Rocky Flats, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/09Vol II, Part 2: Hanford, Worlking Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/10Vol II, Part 3: Los Alamos, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/11Vol II, Part 4: Savannah River, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/12Vol II, Part 5: Argonne - West, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/13Vol II, Part 6: Lawrence Livermore Working Gr. AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/14Vol II, Part 7: Mound, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/15Vol II, Part 8: Argonnne - East, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/16Vol II, Part 9: Oak Ridge, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/17Vol II, Part 10: Sandia, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/18Vol II, Part 11: Lawrence Berkeley Working Gr. AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/19Vol II, Part 12: Pantex, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/20Vol II, Part 13: Sites with small Pu Holdings WG Asses.Plutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/21Vol II, Appendix A: Process and ProtocolPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/22Vol II, Appendix B, Part 1: Rocky Flats, Site AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994
3.01.5.30/23Vol II, Appendix B, Part 2: Hanford, Site AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE september 1994