Title  |
Author |
Date |
Magazine | categories / reduce selection |
A critical, comparative look at the health effects of Chernobyl  |
NIRS/WISE Ukraine; UNDP and UNICEF, 25 January 2002 |
01-10-2003 |
NM |
BANDAZHEVSKY CENSORSHIP HEALTH POPULATION IAEA INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES COSTS NUCLEAR ENERGY LOW-LEVEL RADIATION LOBBY COMPANIES MUTATIONS UKRAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTEN RUSSIA CHERNOBYL -DISASTER UNITED NATIONS WHO BELARUS |
| Nuclear power's burdened future |
Flavin, Christopher |
01-07-1987 |
BAS |
IMPORTANCE NUCLEAR IN TOTAL ENERGYPRODUCTION BELGIUM CONSTRUCTION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT GERMANY ENERGY POLICY, GENERAL FINLAND FRANCE UNITED KINGDOM IAEA JAPAN COSTS NUCLEAR ENERGY OPINION POLLS PHASE-OUT POLITIEK RUSSIA CHERNOBYL -DISASTER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Russia |
Sergie Ermakov |
01-08-2001 |
NEW |
BILIBINO, SU BNFL CONSTRUCTION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ECONOMY – GENERAL EDF ELECTRICITY FRAMATOME OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH IAEA KALININ, SU KOLA, SU COSTS NUCLEAR ENERGY KURSK, SU LENINGRAD LIFETIME EXTENSION MINATOME NOVOVORONEZH, SU DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER DISASTERPLANS ROSENERGOATOM ROSTOV, VOLGODONSK RUSSIA COOPERATION WANO |
| The Chernobyl legacy |
(645-646.5752) Rebecca Harms, MEP |
09-06-2006 |
NM |
CONTAMINATION CONGRESS GERMANY EBRD ECONOMY – GENERAL EUROPE HEALTH POPULATION UNITED KINGDOM IAEA COSTS NUCLEAR ENERGY UKRAINE RADIOACTIVE FOOD RUSSIA SARCOPHAGUS CHERNOBYL -DISASTER BELARUS |
