the Laka catalogue

no title author date
3.01.5.30/44 Plutonium Wastes from the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex: 7 JulyR.Alvarez, Institute for Policy Studies July 2010
3.01.5.30/43 Half-lives, half-truths, and other radioactive legacies of the C-W.Barbaa Rose Johnston October 2006
3.01.5.30/40From Cleanup to StewardshipUS DOE October 1999
3.01.5.30/38Missing the Path to "Cleanup": The Path ForwardAlliance for Nuclear Accountability July 1998
3.01.5.30/36Missing the Path to "Cleanup": False economic assumptions and failed contracting practicesAlliance for Nuclear Accountability May 1998
3.01.5.30/37Missing the Path to "Cleanup": Smoke, mirrors, and contamination: DOE's contractor Intergration Team ReportAlliance for Nuclear Accountability May 1998
3.01.5.30/35Missing the Path to "Cleanup": Root causes of the failures in the US DOEs nuclear weapons environmental programAlliance for Nuclear Accountability March 1998
3.01.5.30/05Plutonium Accounting ReleasedDepartment Of Energy February 1996
3.01.5.30/06Plutonium: the First 50 Years. US' plutonium production, acquisition, and utilization from 1944 to 1994Department Of Energy February 1996
3.01.5.30/03Alternative Futures for DOE National LaboratoriesEnergy Advisory Board February 1995
3.01.5.30/04Alternative Futures for DOE National Laboratories, Vol IIDepartment Of Energy September 1994
3.01.5.30/08Vol II, Part 1: Rocky Flats, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/09Vol II, Part 2: Hanford, Worlking Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/10Vol II, Part 3: Los Alamos, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/11Vol II, Part 4: Savannah River, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/12Vol II, Part 5: Argonne - West, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/13Vol II, Part 6: Lawrence Livermore Working Gr. AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/14Vol II, Part 7: Mound, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/15Vol II, Part 8: Argonnne - East, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/16Vol II, Part 9: Oak Ridge, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/17Vol II, Part 10: Sandia, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/18Vol II, Part 11: Lawrence Berkeley Working Gr. AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/19Vol II, Part 12: Pantex, Working Group AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/20Vol II, Part 13: Sites with small Pu Holdings WG Asses.Plutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/21Vol II, Appendix A: Process and ProtocolPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/22Vol II, Appendix B, Part 1: Rocky Flats, Site AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/23Vol II, Appendix B, Part 2: Hanford, Site AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/24Vol II, Appendix B, Part 3: Los Alamos, Site AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/25Vol II, Appendix B, Part 4: Savannah River Site AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994
3.01.5.30/26Vol II, Appendix B, Part 5: Argonne -West Site AssessmentPlutonium Working Gr US DoE September 1994