Laka releases IAEA-list with (near) accidents in nuclear power stations

Today, the Laka-foundation released a list with reports from almost 1,000 incidents and (near) accidents with nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities. Since 1990 the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA has gathered these reports. The full list of reports gives neighbors, NGO’s and journalists a better insight into how often and how grave there have been serious mishaps at nuclear facilities around the world.

Accidents and technical and human errors are reported by national nuclear regulatory agencies to the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA. The IAEA collects the incident reports in order to warn other nuclear operators for possible routes of failure. The IAEA’s aim is that by doing so, similar accidents at nuclear power plants, reprocessing plants, fuel enrichment plants, nuclear laboratories, irradiation facilities and with radioactive transports, can be prevented.

INES-scale
National regulators report incidents using the INES-scale. INES-0 is the lowest level and INES-7 the most severe, similar to the Richter scale for earthquakes. The Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters were rated INES-7. A fire in 1993 in a controlled area, part of the Belgium Tihange-1 nuclear power plant was rated INES-0 by the then Belgium regulator AIB–Vinçotte.
Not every nuclear incident is reported to the IAEA, and between national regulators there seem to be differences from in which level of incidents are reported. For example, only a few incidents which have been registered by the Dutch national regulator ANVS are found in the IAEA-list which Laka released. Laka assumes that national regulators report the more grave incidents to the IAEA.
The INES-scale, other than the Richter scale for earthquakes, is prone to interpretation. This results in seemingly serious incidents being rated low and small disruptions being rated high. For example, in 2013, the Slovenian regulator URSJV rated the discovery of damaged reactor fuel in the Krško nuclear power plant INES-0. The integrity of the fuel in a nuclear reactor being of high safety relevance, one would expect any fuel damage incident to be rated higher.

The Vienna-based IAEA only releases reports from the previous twelve months to the public. After twelve months, accident reports are hidden from the IAEA-website. This makes it impossible for neighbors, non-governmental organizations and journalists to monitor the occurrence of nuclear incidents throughout the years. The risks of a certain nuclear power station can only be assessed by the frequency and the gravity of incidents occurring throughout the years. By releasing the full IAEA-list with all reported incidents and accidents since 1990, Laka, an Amsterdam based research group on nuclear energy, makes this safety-relevant accessible. To provide better access to the overview of incidents and accidents, Laka put all reported incidents also in an on-line map.

Laka follows the IAEA-report listing and will not add incidents or accident reports on its own. A complete overview of all registered incidents in nuclear and radiological installation in the Netherlands is available in the annual incident reports from the Dutch regulator ANVS

The Laka Foundation is an Amsterdam-based documentation and research center on nuclear energy. Laka documents, analyses and comments for over thirty years (the development of) nuclear energy and is a member of Nuclear Transparency Watch (NWT), a European network that promotes a citizen watch on nuclear safety and transparency.

This entry was posted in , and tagged on by .
Do you have a remark or did you spot an inconsistency? Let us know!

About Stichting Laka

Het documentatie- en onderzoekscentrum kernenergie - Ketelhuisplein 43, Amsterdam - tel: 020-6168294 - mail: info@laka.org - Twitter: @LakaNieuws - FB: facebook.com/stg.laka - Linkedin: company:stichting-laka - ActivityPub: @lakanieuws@laka.org


Related posts:

 

  • 20 April 2024: Chemelot: SMR at Limburg chemical cluster undesirable

    Last year, the Dutch Province of Limburg started an alliance in which, besides the local government, research institutes, small nuclear reactor (SMR) developers, utilities, industrial customers and funders cooperated. With this "Limburg SMR alliance" Limburg  tried to lead the way towards an SMR in Limburg. The preferred site for a first SMR would be Chemelot, […]


  • 3 April 2024: France to produce tritium for nuclear weapons in EDF civilian nuclear reactors

    From the IPFM: During a visit to the Civaux nuclear power plant on 18 March 2024, France's Minister of the Armed Forces unveiled a plan to use the plant to produce tritium for the French nuclear weapons program. Civaux is a civilian power plant that belongs to and is operated by Electricité de France. According […]


  • 2 April 2024: EU and US doubled purchases of nuclear fuel & uranium from Russia in 2023

    An analysis by the Norwegian NGO Bellona of transborder trade operations with the customs code 840130 (irradiated fuel assemblies or fuel elements) show a more than twofold increase of import to EU countries of fresh nuclear fuel in cash terms – from 280 million Euros in 2022 to 686 million Euros in 2023. In physical […]


  • 1 April 2024: AFP: France eyes spent uranium plant to bypass Russia

    The French government has said it is "seriously" studying the option of building a plant to convert and enrich reprocessed uranium to cut its reliance on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine. The only plant in the world that currently converts reprocessed uranium for use in nuclear power plants is in Russia. "The option of […]


  • 21 March 2024: Jan vd Putte warns for Rosatom

    Jan vd Putte quickly changed from dressing as the pied piper at the protest during the IAEA nuclear power conference to warn for the Russian nuclear power conglomerate Rosatom and its role in Ukraine.


  • 21 March 2024: Tripling-pledge is based on a fairytale

    Anke Herold, Executive Director Oeko-Institut, Freiburg (Germany), in Brussels about the claim to triple nuclear by 2050: IPCC scenarios vs forecast development of nuclear.