Despite ‘termination’ NRG confirms: Still weapons-grade uranium in Dutch nuclear reactor

Despite its triumphant press release of the contrary, two years ago, NRG, the operator of the High Flux Reactor in the Netherlands, this week confirmed Laka’s suspicion that NRG is still using weapons-grade highly enriched uranium in its reactor. Therefore, the Netherlands is currently in breach of its agreement with Obama, reached at the Nuclear Security Summit in the Hague in 2014, to cease the use of weapons-prone highly enriched uranium for civil medical use.

Early 2018, NRG, the operator of the High Flux Reactor (HFR), sent out a press release, asserting that the Netherlands has complied with the deal, struck in 2014 with Barack Obama, by converting for the production of Molybdenum, an important medical isotope, from the use of High Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Low Enriched Uranium (LEU).

This week it turns out that in 2018 only Curium, one of the customers of NRG, had converted from HEU to LEU. IRE, another customer of NRG, is still not ready for the conversion. IRE is still regularly shipping HEU-targets to Petten to have them irradiated in the HFR.
Confronted by journalists with the findings of Laka, NRG confirms to NRC Handelsblad that it has indeed not ceased to irradiate HEU.

Dirk Bannink, spokesperson for Laka, commented: "Unbelievable that NRG made the bold statement that the Netherlands has ceased using HEU while that never really was the case. This sheds a dim light on other bold assertions of NRG, for example, that funders would be interested in the Pallas reactor, the, by NRG, much aspired successor of the HFR."

For further information, see the original Dutch article.

This entry was posted in and tagged on by .

About Stichting Laka

Het documentatie- en onderzoekscentrum kernenergie - Ketelhuisplein 43, Amsterdam - tel: 020-6168294 - mail: info@laka.org - Bsky: @laka.org - FB: facebook.com/stg.laka - Linkedin: company:stichting-laka - Mastodon: @laka@www.laka.org

Do you have a remark or did you spot an inconsistency? Let us know!

Related posts:

 

  • 10 February 2026: Authorized Noise: Normalising Risks

    Behnam Raeesian is an internationally recognized visual artist and poster designer from Iran, known for bold political and cultural works. Through exhibitions, workshops, jury roles, and collaborations with cultural institutions worldwide, he has built a strong voice in contemporary political graphic design. His projects confront complex issues such as nuclear risk and technological impact, transforming […]


  • 14 July 2025: The Nuclear Mirage: Why SMRs Won’t Save Nuclear Power

    Everywhere you look, the nuclear industry’s hype machine is in overdrive. Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, and the UK government all tout small modular reactors as the silver bullet for climate change and energy security. Tech billionaires are hiring nuclear veterans. Wall Street is whispering about “round-the-clock power” for artificial intelligence data centers. For those old enough […]


  • 25 March 2025: War games: aanval op Zuid-Korea’s nucleaire faciliteiten als ‘smoke-screen’ voor invasie Taiwan

    Kernenergie en veiligheid: A wargame sought to test if a major radiological release that would prompt the evacuation of millions of civilians in South Korea could distract key US allies from assisting and rebuffing an all-out military invasion of Taiwan. The short answer was yes. The game originally presumed that China, wanting to keep the […]


  • 22 November 2024: Problemen met nieuwe kerncentrale Olkiluoto in Scandinavië

    Big batteries and EVs to the rescue again as faults with new nuclear plant cause chaos on Nordic grids The Finnish nuclear power plant Olkiluoto was finally connected to the grid last year, at an estimated cost of €11 billion compared to the original budget of €3 billion. That cost blowout forced its developer, the […]


  • 6 May 2024: UK: Estimated cost of undersea nuclear graveyard now £66bn

    A vast subsea nuclear graveyard planned to hold Britain’s burgeoning piles of radioactive waste is set to become the biggest, longest-lasting and most expensive infrastructure project ever undertaken in the UK. The project [UK's nuclear waste dump] is now predicted to take more than 150yrs to complete with lifetime costs of £66bn in today’s money...The […]


  • 20 April 2024: Chemelot: SMR at Limburg chemical cluster undesirable

    Last year, the Dutch Province of Limburg started an alliance in which, besides the local government, research institutes, small nuclear reactor (SMR) developers, utilities, industrial customers and funders cooperated. With this "Limburg SMR alliance" Limburg  tried to lead the way towards an SMR in Limburg. The preferred site for a first SMR would be Chemelot, […]