In June 2013, the Laka Foundation published The
Pallas business case - between dream and reality (Dutch). It is an assessment of the plans for a new research reactor which is said to be necessary for the production of medical isotopes. The reactor should be privately funded and should enter operation in 2023. Laka raises serious concerns about the business case and fears that the government has to step in at a later stage to save the project with public money.
This could be okay if there were no alternatives for the production of medical isotopes but there are: See below the May 2010 Laka report: Medical Radioisotope Production Without A Nuclear Reactor.
Here you can find an English summary of the June 2013 report.
Reactors not necessary for the production of medical isotopes
(May 22, 2010) Medical imaging is one of the fastest growing disciplines in medicine. The development of innovative imaging modalities and radio-pharmaceuticals has improved the ability to study biological structures and functions
Artificial radioisotopes, among which those for medical use, are mainly produced by research reactors.
Currently more than 80% of the medical radioisotopes are produced by research reactors. The remaining isotopes are made with particle accelerators, mostly with circular accelerators (cyclotrons) and sometimes with linear accelerators (linac), or by other methods. Medical isotope-production is used by the nuclear industry as PR for nuclear research reactors.
The Laka report is answering the key question: Is it possible to ban the use of research reactors for the production of medical radioisotopes?
The answer is Yes!
Radioisotope production with cyclotrons offers many advantages over a nuclear reactor.
- Firstly, the volume of radioactive waste produced by cyclotrons is far less and much less hazardous than the radioactive waste of research reactors;
- Secondly, the production is decentralized. Cyclotrons are located hospital-based, by which the delivery of pharmaceuticals to patients is much more secured. In addition the risk of transport accidents is practically zero;
- Thirdly, there are no risks due to nuclear-power accidents, because there is no need for controlled chain reactions;
- Fourthly, there is no nuclear proliferation risk.
Download the research report (38 pages, 800kb)
An abridged Dutch version is available for download here