Publication Laka-library:
Reduction of capital costs of nuclear power plants (2000)
| Author | NEA |
| Date | 2000 |
| Classification | 6.01.0.10/62 (COSTS) |
| Front |
|
From the publication:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The short-term prospect of nuclear power in the OECD countries is stagnant. However, an economic, environmentally benign, and publicly acceptable option such as nuclear power must be available in the near future, if commitments by many countries of the world for climate change mitigation and to a sustainable future development path is to be materialised. In order to keep nuclear power as a viable alternative in the future energy market, it is important that nuclear power should be competitive with alternative energy sources. Today's capital investment to construct a nuclear power plant is typically some 60% of generation costs, with fuel costs at 20% and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs the remaining 20%. Since capital investment costs constitute the largest share of the generation cost, identification of the means and assessment of their potential to reduce the capital costs of nuclear plants would be useful for electric utilities to keep nuclear power competitive. This study was undertaken under the auspices of the Nuclear Energy Agency's Committee for Technical and Economic Studies on Nuclear Energy Development and Fuel Cycle. The report represents a synthesis of experiences and views of experts from OECD countries, identifying the means that have been conceived and demonstrated for the reduction of nuclear power plant capital costs and assessing their potential to achieve the cost reduction goal.
This publication is only available at Laka on paper, not as pdf.
You can borrow the publication or request a copy. When we're available, this is possible for a small fee.