Laka Foundation

Publication Laka-library:
The end of the nuclear dream. UKAEA and its role in Nuclear Research and Development (1988)

AuthorM.Flood, FOE UK
DateAugust 1988
Classification 6.01.0.40/45 (HISTORY / DEVELOPMENT NUCLEAR ENERGY)
Front

From the publication:

FOREWORD

The dream of cheap and abundant nuclear power for the UK has never materialised. 
It can now be said with absolute certainty that it never will.

A fair share of the responsibility for this rests firmly with the United Kingdom 
Atomic Energy Authority. Since its establishment in 1954, a series of errors of 
judgement about reactor design and research priorities has left the UK nuclear 
industry as exposed as it's ever been. By the same token, the future of the UKAEA 
itself looks more parlous than ever before.

'The End of the Nuclear Dream' provides a timely review of that troubled history. 
Critics of the industry today often pay insufficient attention to the psychology and 
institutional mindset of those whom they oppose; it's instructive to reconsider the 
'glory days' of the '50s, when many young and idealistic scientists became so 
enthusiastically wrapped up in the nuclear dream, convinced that this was the 
answer both to the UK's security needs and its future energy supply. It is those 
people, now chastened and brought up hard against the reality of their limited 
powers, who preside over a rapidly declining industry.

In the early days, the UKAEA was the nuclear industry, attracting almost unlimited 
(and certainly uncontrolled) funding, dealing not only with research but with 
reactor development, production and operation. In 1962 it employed more than 
40,000 people. But even then, there were constant doubts both about its unwieldy 
structure and a chronic lack of direction.

If there is one single factor which accounts for the differences between the 
disgraceful record of the British nuclear industry, and the apparent success of the 
industry in France, it is surely the failure of British scientist to come up with and 
stay faithful to the right reactor design. The litany of failure in this respect must 
depress even the most enthusiastic advocate of nuclear power. Of the five systems 
the UKAEA has worked on, just two have been put into commercial production. One 
of those (Magnox) is now obsolete; the other (the Advanced Gas Cooled Reactor) 
has been a financial disaster. And even after 30 years of intensive research and 
development, the Fast Breeder Reactor has got mighty little to show for itself.

Advocates of renewable sources of energy will be even more depressed by the fact 
that it is still the UKAEA which is centrally involved in their development through 
its Energy Technology Support Unit. 'The End of the Nuclear Dream' makes out an 
absolutely compelling case for the termination of this under funded and 
institutionally marginal body, and the establishment of a properly resourced 
and supported Renewable Energy Development Agency.

The rise and fall of the UKAEA has run pretty much in parallel with the level of 
public and political confidence in nuclear power in the UK. That is now at an all 
time low. But the erstwhile dreams of the industry have given rise to too many 
nightmares to feel anything other than relief that a new age of reality would now 
seem to be dawning.

Jonathon Porritt
July 1988

This publication is only available at Laka on paper, not as pdf.
You can borrow the publication or request a copy. When we're available, this is possible for a small fee.