Publication Laka-library:
Poisoned Power. The Case Against Nuclear Power Plants
| Author | J.Gofman, A.R.Tamplin |
![]() | - |
| Date | June 1971 |
| Classification | 6.01.4.00/36 (RADIATION - GENERAL) |
| Remarks | Online at https://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/ |
| Front |
|
From the publication:
POISONED POWER by John W. Gofman and Arthur R. Tamplin THE CASE AGAINST NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS > * In one year's operation, a single nuclear power plant generates as > much radioactive poison as one-thousand Hiroshima-type atomic bombs! > > * Insurance companies -- experts on judging risks -- protect themselves > against anticipated claims from private citizens for nuclear plant > accidents and radioactive damage by specifically excluding such coverage > in contracts. > > * The AEC--designated as the public's "protector"--is charged with > promoting the nuclear industry. This is an impossible conflict of > interest. > > * There is "not a shred of evidence" that AEC radiation standards for > peaceful use of the atom are truly safe. > > * Nuclear power is _not_ the sole adequate source of electricity for > the future. There are efficient alternatives -- cleaner, cheaper, safer > ones. > > In 1963 the Atomic Energy Commission asked Dr. John Gofman and Dr. Arthur > Tamplin to undertake a series of long range studies on potential dangers > that might arise from the "peaceful uses of the atom." Assuming that the > Atomic Energy Commission seriously wanted to know the truth about the > safety of nuclear electricity and its generation, the authors attacked > the problem with gusto. > > Here's what they learned: > > * Radiation from rapidly expanding Atomic Energy programs is a far, far > more serious hazard to human life than anyone had ever conceived it to > be. > > * Atomic radiation will result in many times more deaths from cancer > and leukemia than previously thought possible. The potential damage to > future generations from genetic damage has been even more grossly > underestimated. > > But far from having their findings welcomed, Gofman and Tamplin > experienced a torrent of personal and professional condemnation from the > nuclear triumvirate--the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, the Joint > Committee on Atomic Energy, and the Electrical Utility Industry. The > authors attribute this to their announced unshakeable conviction that the > entire nuclear electricity industry was--and still is--developing under a > set of totally false illusions of safety and economy. This judgment was > inimical to the interests of all these groups. > > _Poisoned Power_ is a starkly realistic book. It is also a hopeful one, > for the authors firmly believe that citizen action _can_ combat the > nuclear power group's carefully contrived propaganda campaign. To help > the citizen to navigate through the murky and controversial areas of > debate Gofman and Tamplin provide an appendix containing the most > frequently raised questions on the merits of nuclear power, with clear, > direct answers. _Poisoned Power_ shows that we can have the electric > power we need to maintain our high quality of life. And we can do it > without destroying our environment through the introduction of > radioactive poisons that will last, essentially, forever. > > Finally, the authors make a revolutionary proposal--an Adversary System > of Scientific Inquiry, which will open all new technologies of national > scope to serious, objective scrutiny by qualified scientists. These men > would be specifically charged with exploring each proposed development > with an eye to uncovering possible physical, social or economic hazards. > These points would then be weighed against any advantages by the > scientific community and the lay public before further development of the > technology would be permitted. The authors believe such a system would > long ago have postponed the proliferation of nuclear power stations to > allow for detailed investigation into their safety and efficiency > compared with alternate sources of power.
This publication is digitally available in the Laka library, but it's not on-line.
E-mail us (info@laka.org) if you would like the pdf sent to you (with the subject, number and title). Of course you can also come by.
