Publication Laka-library:
Vol II, Appendix A: Process and Protocol (1994)
| Author | Plutonium Working Gr US DoE |
| Date | September 1994 |
| Classification | 3.01.5.30/21 (UNITED STATES - GENERAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS PLANTS + CLEAN UP) |
| Front | 
|
From the publication:
Volume II - Appendix A INTRODUCTION This appendix contains documentation prepared by the Plutonium ES&H Vulnerability Working Group for conducting the Plutonium ES&H Vulnerability Assessment and training the assessment teams. It has the following five parts: A.1 The "Project Plan" describes the genesis of the project, sets forth the goals, objectives and scope, provides definitions, the projected schedule, and elements f protocol. A.2 The "Assessment Plan" provides a detailed methodology necessary to guide the many professionals who have been recruited to conduct the DOE-wide assessment. It provides guidance on which types and forms of plutonium are to be considered within the scope of the assessment (in-scope versus out-of-scope), and lays out the assessment methodology to be used by both the "Site Assessment Teams" (SATs) and the "Working Group Assessment Teams" (WGATs). A.3 The memorandum from the Project to Operations Office Managers provides the protocol and direction for participation in the assessment by external stakeholders (individuals or organizations) and members of the public; and the guidance for the physical inspection of plutonium materials in storage. A.4 The memorandum from the Project to the assessment teams provides guidance for vulnerability screening criteria, vulnerability evalution and prioritization process, and vulnerability quantification for prioritization, for use by both theSATs and the WGATs to assist the Working Group in prioritizing vulnerabilities across the DOE complex. A.5 The "Team Training" manual was used at the training session held in Colorado Springs on April19-21, 1994 for all members of the Working Group Assessment Teams (about 100 people) and for the leaders of the Site Assessment Teams (about 30 individuals). The session covered the scope of the project, the assessment methodology, and numerous technical topics needed to carry out the assessments at all DOE sites. The goal was to provide the same training to all of the individuals who would be conducting the assessments, and thereby provide consistency in the conduct of the assessments and uniformity in reporting of the results. The training manual in Section A.5 includes supplemental material provided to the attendees after the meeting.
This publication is only available at Laka on paper, not as pdf.
You can borrow the publication or request a copy. When we're available, this is possible for a small fee.