Publication Laka-library:
NuScale’s Small Modular Reactor. Risks of Rising Costs, Likely Delays, and Increasing Competition Cast Doubt on Long-Running Development Effort (2022)
| Author | D.Schlissel, D.Wamsted, IEEFA Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis |
![]() |
6-01-3-60-12.pdf |
| Date | February 2022 |
| Classification | 6.01.3.60/12 (NUCLEAR SAFETY - REACTORS - OTHER TYPES, SMALL MODULAR REACTORS) |
| Front |
From the publication:
NuScale’s Small Modular Reactor Risks of Rising Costs, Likely Delays, and Increasing Competition Cast Doubt on Long-Running Development Effort David Schlissel, Director of Resource Planning Analysis Dennis Wamsted, Energy Analyst February 2022 The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) Executive Summary Too late, too expensive, too risky and too uncertain. That, in a nutshell, describes NuScale’s planned small modular reactor (SMR) project, which has been in development since 20001 and will not begin commercial operations before 2029, if ever. As originally sketched out, the SMR was designed to include 12 independent power modules, using common control, cooling and other equipment in a bid to lower costs. But that sketch clearly was only done in pencil, as it has changed repeatedly during the development process, with uncertain implications for the units’ cost, performance and reliability. For example, the NuScale power modules were initially based on a design capable of generating 35 megawatts (MW), which grew first to 40MW and then to 45MW. When the company submitted its design application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2016, the modules’ size was listed at 50MW. Subsequent revisions have pushed the output to 60MW, before settling at the current 77MW. Similarly, the 12-unit grouping has recently been amended, with the company now saying it will develop a 6-module plant with 462MW of power. NuScale projects that the first module, once forecast for 2016, will come online in 2029 with all six modules online by 2030. While these basic parameters have changed, the company has insisted its costs are firm, and that the project will be economic.
