Laka Foundation

Publication Laka-library:
Vol II, Appendix B, Part 7: Mound, Site Assessment (1994)

AuthorPlutonium Working Gr US DoE
DateSeptember 1994
Classification 3.01.5.30/28 (UNITED STATES - GENERAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS PLANTS + CLEAN UP)
Front

From the publication:

ES&H VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FORM

Vulnerability #1: Uncertainties in Plutonium Packaging

Block #1: Title of Vulnerability (< 20 words)

Uncertainty of inner packaging configuration of several older plutonium 
packages in vault storage that could result in barrier deficiencies

Block #2: Executive Summary (<50 words)

There are about 37 primary containers, packaged for storage several years ago, that 
have very little documentation on the nature of the packaging of the inner layers. 
These packages apparently met the requirements at the time they were placed in 
storage but there is insufficient information currently available on the packaging 
to permit a good assessment of all the barriers to the release of material to workers, 
the environment, and/or the public.

Block #3: Describe the material, packaging, barrier and facility combination 
that contribute to the vulnerability.

It was the procedure of the time to package plutonium in at least two layers of 
sealed metal containers. These double containers were typically placed in a drum 
or shipping container before storage in the vault. Even though it is believed that 
this describes the inner configurations of the packages in question, it cannot 
assure this with reasonable certainty.

Block #4: describe adverse conditions, events and related concerns that 
contribute to the vulnerability.

In order for the uncertainty in the inner packaging to contribute to the vulnerability, 
(1) the material would have to produce sufficient pressure to rupture or cause the
successive layers of containment to leak, (2) the material would have to be subjected 
to fire sufficient to cause the successive inner layers of containment to rupture or 
leak or (3) the drum or shipping vessel would have to be punctured by a forklift to 
release Pu to the vault.

Block. #5: Describe the compensatory measures that reduce the severity 
of the vulnerability.

In the T-Building vault, the plutonium packages are stored in drums or shipping 
containers. There are two layers of structural barriers: the vault and the building 
walls. The vault and the building are fully sprinkled. The vault is monitored 
continuously for release of airborne Pu particulates. The vault and packages are 
smeared for radioactivity frequently. A release could be detected quickly and 
mitigated.

This publication is only available at Laka on paper, not as pdf.
You can borrow the publication or request a copy. When we're available, this is possible for a small fee.