Laka Foundation

Publication Laka-library:
Vol II, Part 7: Mound, Working Group Assessment (1994)

AuthorPlutonium Working Gr US DoE
DateSeptember 1994
Classification 3.01.5.30/14 (UNITED STATES - GENERAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS PLANTS + CLEAN UP)
Front

From the publication:

Mound

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This is the report of a visit to the Mound site by the Working Group Assessment 
Team (WGAT) to assess plutonium vulnerabilities. Purposes of the visit were: to 
review results of the site's self assessment of current practices for handling and 
storing plutonium; to conduct an independent assessment of these practices; to 
reconcile differences and assemble a final list of vulnerabilities; to calculate 
consequences and probability for each vulnerability; and to issue a report to the 
Working Group. This report, representing completion of the Mound visit, will be 
compiled along with those from all other sites with plutonium inventories as part 
of a final report to the Secretary of Energy.

Another objective of the visit by the WGAT was to inform the public and local 
stakeholders of the project's mission, its modus operandi, and the specific results 
of the Mound assessment. To this end, an "In Briefing" was held at the outset of 
the WGAT visit to explain purposes and actions to be taken, and an "Exit Briefing" 
was held at the conclusion of the visit to reveal results. Both meetings were 
announced publicly and were accessible to the public. Questions from the public as 
well as from Mound personnel were addressed at each of the briefings. This report 
also provides an accounting of these meetings.

The Site Assessment Team (SAT) had conducted its self assessment and had drafted a 
report of its findings prior to the visit by the WGAT. Three proposed "vulnerabilities" 
were identified by the SAT. The WGAT reviewed the SAT report and found that it 
needed to be supplemented in order to provide sufficient detail to substantiate the 
objectives of the assessment. Discussions between the two teams explored the 
deficiencies, and necessary corrections were identified for implementation by the 
SAT. The WGAT conducted "walkdowns" of the four facilities identified by the SAT 
as containing plutonium, namely SW /R Building, T Building, Building 38 and 
Building 50. The team interviewed a number of workers and managers, discussed 
impressions with the SAT, and concluded the visit by identifying nine additional 
vulnerabilities.

Two of the vulnerabilities identified at Mound are believed to be generic to all sites 
within the DOE weapons complex. The first of these relates to the loss of institutional 
memory for the processes and configurations associated with the buildings, 
equipment, and material packaging. Such loss of institutional memory is exacerbated 
by continuing reduction in operating budgets. Most replacement personnel do not 
have, nor can they acquire, "hands-on" experience with plutonium because operations 
and facilities are shut down.

This publication is only available at Laka on paper, not as pdf.
You can borrow the publication or request a copy. When we're available, this is possible for a small fee.