Publicatie Laka-bibliotheek:
Consequence Analysis of a Catastrophic Failure of Highly Active Liquid Waste Tanks Serving the Thorp and Magnox Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plants at Sellafield (1994)
| Auteur | P.Taylor |
![]() | - |
| Datum | 1994* |
| Classificatie | 2.05.8.35/05 (GROOT-BRITTANNIË - SELLAFIELD - THORP) |
| Voorkant |
|
Uit de publicatie:
CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF THE CATASTROPHIC FAILURE OF HIGHLY ACTIVE LIQUID WASTE TANKS SERVING THE THORP AND MAGNOX NUCLEAR FUELS REPROCESSING PLANTS AT SELLAFIELD INTRODUCTION 1.01 Reprocessing spent radioactive fuel at the THORP plant will produce highly radioactive liquids. The storage of these represents a unique hazard:- there are potential catastrophic consequences of a failure of safety systems and loss of containment. Whilst the seriousness of the hazard is readily admitted by UK authorities, for example, by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, no study of the full consequences of failure has been made available for public discussion. This is in contrast to the situation in the USA and Germany, where 'accident consequence studies' that were originally performed within the nuclear industry, were later made public. These early studies (one at the US Oak Ridge National Laboratories (1) and another at the Institute for Reactor Safety (IRS) in Germany (2) indicated that liquid waste tanks had the potential to boil if cooling failed and to eventually produce a high temperature 'salt-melt' which would release volatile radioactive nuclides, chiefly caesium-137 and strontium-90, in large quantities. The consequences of such a release would be 10-100 times more severe than a single nuclear reactor melt-down, such as occurred at Chernobyl. 1. 02 Despite secrecy concerning waste stores in Britain, an attempt was made to raise this issue at the Public Inquiry into extension of Windscale (now Sellafield) for Thermal Oxide (fuel) Reprocessing, the so-called THORP, in I977. Magnox reprocessing had already led to several tanks being filled with Highly Active Wastes (HAW) by 1977. At that time a group of concerned scientists (members of the Political Ecology Research Group in Oxford), brought to the attention of the Inquiry the two studies mentioned above. BNFL had presented a very limited 'worst-case' accident study, wherein the cooling systems to the tanks fail for unspecified reasons and begin to boil, venting 1/10,000th of the inventory of one tank in the process. The Political Ecology Research Group (PERG) requested that the studies be taken a stage further to where the tank boils to dryness and liberates 900A, of the volatile caesium and 5% of the strontium and ruthenium, as considered in the US and German scenarios. It was argued (by Dr Gordon Thompson, a nuclear engineer then with PERG) that once failure had proceeded as far as the boiling phase, there would be no certainty of recovery. (1) Details of the Oak Ridge Studies were discussed at the Windscale Inquiry, particularly documents BNFL 223, 299 and 309 submitted in evidence, see also: Blanco & Parker, ORNL-1465 (1966) pp35-41. (2) Bachner et.al. Report No 290, Institut fur Reaktorsicherheit, Koln (August 1976).*) Geschatte datum
Deze publicatie is digitaal beschikbaar in de Laka-biblitoheek maar de pdf staat niet online.
Mail ons (info@laka.org) als u de pdf toegestuurd wilt krijgen (met onderwerp, volgnummer en titel). U kunt natuurlijk ook langskomen.
