Publicatie Laka-bibliotheek:
All risk, no reward for taxpayers and ratepayers: The Economics of subsidizing the ‘Nuclear Renaissance’ with loan guarantees and construction work in progress (2009)
| Auteur | Mark Cooper, IEER |
![]() |
6-01-0-10-83.pdf |
| Datum | november 2009 |
| Classificatie | 6.01.0.10/83 (KOSTEN) |
| Voorkant |
|
Uit de publicatie:
ALL RISK, NO REWARD FOR TAXPAYERS AND RATEPAYERS
THE ECONOMICS OF SUBSIDIZING THE ‘NUCLEAR RENAISSANCE’ WITH
LOAN GUARANTEES AND CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS
Mark Cooper
Senior Fellow for Economic Analysis
Institute for Energy and the Environment
Vermont Law School
November 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ISSUE BRIEF 1
The Nuclear Industry’s Demands for Direct Subsidies
Nuclear Reactors are Uneconomic and Highly Risky
Subsidies for Nuclear Reactor Construction Harm Taxpayers and Ratepayers
The Bottom Line on Nuclear Reactors
I. INTRODUCTION 8
A. Shifting Risks and Costs to Taxpayers and Ratepayers
B. Outline
II. ASSESSING THE ECONOMIC RISK OF NUCLEAR REACTORS 10
A. The Importance of Properly Allocating Risk
B. The Risk of Nuclear Reactors Imposed on Taxpayers and Ratepayers
C. The Risks Facing Nuclear Reactors
D. The Bottom Line for Taxpayers And Ratepayers
Nuclear Reactors are High Risk, High Cost Ventures
Subsidies will Impose Severe Financial Harm on Taxpayers and Ratepayers
Environmental Externality Arguments Do Not Justify Subsidies
E. Conclusion
III. THE RISK OF NUCLEAR REACTORS IN THE EYES OF INDUSTRY 20
ANALYSTS
A. Moody’s
B. Standard & Poor’s
C. Consulting Firms
IV. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF THE INCREASING RISK OF NUCLEAR 29
REACTORS AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL
A. Technology Risk
B. Policy Risk
C. Regulatory Risk
D. Execution Risks
E. Marketplace Risks
Demand
Natural Gas Prices
F. Financial Risk
G. The Bottom Line on D

