Publicatie Laka-bibliotheek:
Fission for Funds: The Financing of Nuclear Power Plants
Auteur | J.Weibezahn, B.Steigerwald |
![]() |
6-01-0-10-98.pdf |
Datum | 2024 |
Classificatie | 6.01.0.10/98 (KOSTEN) |
Voorkant |
Uit de publicatie:
Fission for Funds: The Financing of Nuclear Power Plants Weibezahn, J., & Steigerwald, B. (2024). Copenhagen School of Energy Infrastructure. 1. INTRODUCTION The increasing decarbonisation pressure together with recent energy price shocks is fuelling a revived debate on new nuclear generation capacity in many European states. In this report, we provide a synopsis of financing models currently being applied or under development for newly built nuclear power plants in Europe, catering to the special risk profile of such projects. In February 2024, the European Commission released a recommendation for a reenhouse gas reduction target of 90% by 2040 (compared to 1990) for the European Union on the way to climate neutrality in 2050 (European Commission 2024). The power sector is expected to reach full decarbonisation by as early as 2040. So-called small modular reactors (SMRs) are expected to play a role in decarbonisation by the early 2030s. A new European Industry Alliance on Small Modular Reactors has been launched alongside the aforementioned communication to accelerate this development. Also, in the British Energy Security Plan (UK Government 2023b), nuclear power plays a major role with the stated ambition to deploy 24 gigawatts (GW) by 2050 – including SMR projects, corresponding to around 25% of the projected electricity demand. On the global scale, at the COP28 in Dubai on December 2, 2023, 22 states – of which 15 are in Europe, and of those 12 are EU member states – have committed to working on tripling nuclear power capacity by 2050 compared to 2020 levels. The increasing decarbonisation pressure, together with recent energy price shocks in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, is fuelling a revived debate on new nuclear generation capacity in many European states, partially driven by nuclear industry lobby organisations – be it large- capacity conventional reactors or small-capacity SMRs